COUNTERING EXCLUSION: THE COMPLAINANT’S OBLIGATION

2017] COUNTERING EXCLUSION: THE COMPLAINANT’S OBLIGATION 425 the famous Standard Stations9 decision of 1949. There, the Supreme Court held that “proof that competition has been foreclosed in a substantial share of the line of commerce affected” was all that mattered to find a violation.10 Although that standard of “quantitative substantiality” was revised into more

  Obligations, Exclusion, Countering, Complainants, Countering exclusion, The complainant s obligation