Transcription of 1179 Evaluation Contest Ballot
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Judge s Official Ballot Evaluation Contest (Detach and submit to counters)Name of ContestantFirst Place: _____Second Place: _____Third Place: _____PLACE RANKING POINTS (for counters use only)First Place 3 pointsSecond Place 2 pointsThird Place 1 point(Signature of Judge)(Judge s Name; Please Print)Analytical QualityClear, Focused4028-3917-270-16 RecommendationsPositive, Specific, Helpful3022-2913-210-12 TechniqueSympathetic, Sensitive,Motivational 1511-146-100-5 SummationConcise, Encouraging1511-146-100-5 TOTAL SCORE (100 Points Possible)JUDGING ITEMSSUGGESTED POINT VALUESEXCELLENTVERYGOODG OODFAIR12345678910 NOTE: Votes must be cast for first, second and third place or the Ballot will be ContestJudge s Guide and BallotJudging CriteriaAnalytical Quality refers to the effectiveness of the Evaluation . Every Evaluation should carefully analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the speaker s presentation. Were the evaluator s comments clear and logical?
strengths and weaknesses of the presentation? Recommendations are an important part of an evaluation. An evaluator not only points out the strengths and weaknesses of a speech, he/she also offers specific recommendations for improvement. Recommendations should …
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}