PDF4PRO ⚡AMP

Modern search engine that looking for books and documents around the web

Example: tourism industry

1179 Evaluation Contest Ballot

Judge s Official Ballot Evaluation Contest (Detach and submit to counters)Name of ContestantFirst Place: _____Second Place: _____Third Place: _____PLACE RANKING POINTS (for counters use only)First Place 3 pointsSecond Place 2 pointsThird Place 1 point(Signature of Judge)(Judge s Name; Please Print)Analytical QualityClear, Focused4028-3917-270-16 RecommendationsPositive, Specific, Helpful3022-2913-210-12 TechniqueSympathetic, Sensitive,Motivational 1511-146-100-5 SummationConcise, Encouraging1511-146-100-5 TOTAL SCORE (100 Points Possible)JUDGING ITEMSSUGGESTED POINT VALUESEXCELLENTVERYGOODG OODFAIR12345678910 NOTE: Votes must be cast for first, second and third place or the Ballot will be ContestJudge s Guide and BallotJudging CriteriaAnalytical Quality refers to the effectiveness of the Evaluation . Every Evaluation should carefully analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the speaker s presentation. Were the evaluator s comments clear and logical? Did the evaluator identify specific strengths and weaknesses of the presentation?

Summation is how the evaluator concludes the evaluation. The conclusion should briefly summarize the evaluator’s comments and suggestions, and be positive and encouraging. Judge’s Code of Ethics 1. Judges will demonstrate the utmost objectivity.

Loading..

Tags:

  Evaluation

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Spam in document Broken preview Other abuse

Transcription of 1179 Evaluation Contest Ballot

Related search queries