121 F.3d 729, 326 U.S.App.D.C. 276 BEFORE: WALD, …

United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia re sealed 729, 326 276 Argued Feb. 20, June 17, Published in Unredacted Form Aug. 29, : WALD, GINSBURG, and ROGERS, Circuit 29, 1997 Per light of the recent indictment of former Secretary of Agriculture, Mike Espy, it is no longernecessary to maintain under seal any portion of the Court's opinion issued on June 17, 1997. It is,therefore, ORDERED, on the Court's own motion, that the opinion be amended as follows:The previously sealed portions are hereby unsealed. The Clerk is directed to file and issue theunredacted 24 of the opinion issued on June 17, 1997, shall be from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ( ).Theodore S. Greenberg, Deputy Independent Counsel, Alexandria, VA, and CharlesM. Kagay, Chief Appellate Counsel, San Francisco, CA, argued the cause for appellant, with whomDonald C. Smaltz, Independent Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, was on the Neil Eggleston, Washington, DC, argued the cause for appellee, with whom Mark I.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. In re SEALED CASE. No. 96-3124. 121 F.3d 729, 326 U.S.App.D.C. 276 Argued Feb. 20, 1997.

Tags:

  Sealed, In re sealed

Information

Related search queries