Transcription of 5 CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
5 CONSTRAINTSATISFACTIONPROBLEMSI nwhich weseehowtreatingstatesasmore thanjustlittleblack boxesleadsto theinventionofa range ofpowerfulnew search methodsanda deeperunderstandingofproblemstructure and4 exploredtheideathatproblemscanbesolvedby searchinginaspaceofstates. Thesestatescanbeevaluatedbydomain-specif icheuristicsandtestedtoseewhetherthey ,however,eachstateis is representedbyanarbi-BLACKBOX trarydatastructurethatcanbeaccessedonlyb ytheproblem-specificroutines thesuccessorfunction,heuristicfunction, , whosestatesandgoaltestconformtoa standard,structured,andverysimplereprese ntation( ).Searchal-REPRESENTATION gorithmscanbedefinedthattake advantageofthestructureofstatesandusegen eral-purposeratherthanproblem-specifiche uristicsto enablethesolutionoflargeproblems( ).Perhapsmostimportantly, thestandardrepresentationofthegoaltestre vealsthestruc-tureoftheproblemitself( ).Thisleadstomethodsforproblemdecomposit ionandtoanunderstandingoftheintimateconn ectionbetweenthestructureofa ,aconstraintsatisfactionproblem(orCSP)is definedbya setofvari-CONSTRAINTSATISFACTIONPROBLEM ables,X1; X2; : : : ; Xn, anda setofconstraints,C1; C2; : : : ; Cm.
In some cases, we can reduce CONSTRAINTS integer constraint problems to finite-domain problems simply by bounding the values of all the variables. For example, in a scheduling problem, we can set an upper bound equal to the total length of all the jobs to be scheduled.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}