Transcription of A COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
A COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENTIMPLANT SYSTEMS IN THE SAME PATIENTLESTER DU PREEZ1, KURT-W B TOW1, WILFRIED BENNINGHOFF2 The study was designed to compare THREE DIFFERENT implantsystems in the same host and under similar conditions, for theirmedium longevity and functionality in the anterior region ofthe mandible. Various intraoral endosseous IMPLANT systemshave been introduced over the years to equip practitioners inhelping to restore partially- and fully edentulous jaws tofunctionality. To date there are many DIFFERENT implant1 Department of Maxillo-Facial and Oral Surgery, University of Pretoria, South Africa2 Department of Prosthetics and Dental Mechanics, University of Pretoria, South AfricaCorresponding address:Prof Kurt-W B towDepartment of Maxillo-Facial and Oral SurgeryFaculty of Health Science, PO Box 1266,Pretoria 0001, South Africaemail: available on the market. A number of these arebased on the design of the Br nemark submergibleendosseous IMPLANT .
A COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT SYSTEMS IN THE SAME PATIENT LESTER DU PREEZ1, KURT-W BÜTOW1, WILFRIED BENNINGHOFF2 The study was designed to compare three different implant
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B, Project Duration Forecasting …a comparison, Project Duration Forecasting …a comparison of Earned Value Management methods, A COMPARISON OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE, A Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks, Comparison, A Comparison of Logistic, A Comparison of Logistic Regression Pseudo, Comparison of dissolution profile of extended, CFED Phase IV Final Report, CFED Phase IV, Final Report