Transcription of A Global Ranking of Soft Power
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
A Global Ranking of soft Power 2019 Designed by Portland's in-house Content & Brand and Author 7 Contributors 10 Executive Summary 14 IntroductionWhat s past is prologueSmall is beautiful The 2019 soft Power 3026 Methodology of the indexObjective dataSubjective dataChanges, limitations, and shortcomings 36 Results and analysisThe top fiveAmerican soft Power after Trump Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Harvard UniversityThe remaining top ten Is soft Power enough? A realist s perspective from the Little Red Dot" Bilahari Kausikan, National University of SingaporeBreaking down the objective dataBreaking down the resultsThe soft Power of government innovation Adrian Brown, Centre for Public ImpactThe Asia soft Power 10 Making (limited) inroads James Crabtree, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyCONTENTS74 soft Power in a digital first worldPublic diplomacy and our digital future Jay Wang, USC Center on Public
Japan Score | 75.71 09 Australia Score | 73.16 In setting this year’s Soft Power 30 report in such a grave context, we hope to return discussion on soft power to its conceptual roots and definition as a critical foreign policy tool used to align values, norms, objectives, and ultimately action through attraction and persuasion.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}