Transcription of A Guide to Interpretation - ZEISS
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: stock market
A Guide to Interpretation - ZEISS
Humphrey Field Analyzer II-i Single Field AnalysisA Guide to InterpretationSAMPLE CASE 1: 39-year-old patient with normal visual fi CASE 2: 78-year-old patient with probable glaucomatous fi eld, showing indications of a cataract, and an arcuate MAPTHRESHOLD VALUESPROBABILITY SYMBOLSGAZE TRACKINGTOTAL DEVIATIONPROBABILITY MAPPATTERN DEVIATIONPROBABILITY MAPVISUAL FIELD INDICESGLAUCOMA HEMIFIELD TESTNUMERICAL PATTERNDEVIATION MAPNUMERICAL TOTALDEVIATION MAPRELIABILITY INDICES}GRAYSCALE MAPTHRESHOLD VALUESPROBABILITY SYMBOLSGAZE TRACKINGTOTAL DEVIATIONPROBABILITY MAPPATTERN DEVIATIONPROBABILITY MAPVISUAL FIELD INDICESGLAUCOMA HEMIFIELD TESTNUMERICAL PATTERNDEVIATION MAPNUMERICAL TOTALDEVIATION MAPRELIABILITY INDICES}}}123468951071112346895107111. RELIABILITY INDICEST hree indices are presented to assist in the evaluation of test reliability. False Positive Response ErrorsThe false positive (FP) response error score measures the tendency of patients to press the response button even when no stimulus has actually been seen in order to identify so-called trigger-happy patients.
NUMERICAL PATTERN DEVIATION MAP NUMERICAL TOTAL DEVIATION MAP} RELIABILITY INDICES}} 1 23 4 6 8 9 5 10 7 11 1 23 4 6 8 9 5 7 11. 1. RELIABILITY INDICES ... The GHT provides a plain language classifi cation of 30-2 and 24-2 test results based upon patterns of loss commonly seen in glaucoma. Pattern Deviation scores in
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: