Transcription of A Survey on Combinatorial Group Testing Algorithms with ...
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
DIMACSS eriesinDiscreteMathematicsandTheoretical ComputerScienceA SurveyonCombinatorialGroupTestingAlgorit hmswithApplicationstoDNA TRACT. Inthispaper, wegive focusesonseveralclassesofconstructionsno tdiscussedinprevioussurveys,providesa (aDNAsegment)fromthelibrarycontainswhich probefroma saidtobepositivefora probeif it containstheprobe, ,sincecheckingeachclone-probepairis expensive andusuallyonlyafew clonescontainany whenSequenced-TaggedSitemarkers(alsocall edSTSprobes)areused[OHCB89].If thetestresultfora pool(ofclones)isnegative, indicatingthatnocloneinthepoolcontainsth eprobe, justaninstanceofthegeneralgrouptestingpr oblem,inwhicha largepopulationofitemscontaininga smallsetofdefectivesaretobetestedtoident ifythedefectivesefficiently.
gave a nice account of CGT algorithms. The third was an article by Balding et al. (1995, [BBKT96]), which comparatively surveyed certain classes of non-adaptive algorithms. In this paper, we give an overview of Combinatorial Group Testing algorithms with applications to DNA Library Screening. Our survey focuses on several classes of con-
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}