Transcription of ACOMPARISON OFTWO DATACOLLECTING METHODS: …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Hacettepe niversitesiE itimFak ltesiDergisi18: 1 -10[2000}ACOMPARISONOFTWODATACOLLECTINGM ETHODS:INTERVIEWSANDQUESTIONNAIRESB urcuAKBAYRAK* ZET:Bumakaledeveritoplamaarac olaraksosyalbi-limlerveegitimdeyap lanara t rmalardas k akullan lang r meveanketteknikleriincelenmi tir. nceherikitek-nigintan mlanvet rleri zerindedurulmu r melerveanketler e itliy nlerdenkar la t r lm t la t rmamaliyet,s re,planlama, rneklemb y kl - ve rnekleme,istenilenbilgiyeula ma,yanl l k,gizlilik,yan tlamaoran ,ge erlik,g venirlikveverilerinanalizi l- tlerineg reyap lm t ,herikitekniginavan-tajlanvedezavantajla r birtabloda zetlenmi ZC KLER:G r ,Ara t rmaY :Inthisartide, , ,time,schedule,samplesizeandsampling,acc esstoinformation,bias,anonimityandconfid entiaIty,responserate,validity, ,theadvantagesanddisadvantagesofbothtech niquesweresummarisedina :lnterviews, ,Inthisartiele, 'self-administered'and'mailed'questionna ires, kindofconversationandasHull(l)tellsus".]
AComparison ofTwo Data Collecting Methods: lnterviews andQuestionnaires differentpeoplebeforeasimilar, asetofques-tionshasbeenaskedtoindividualrespondentin
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}