Transcription of Arbitration Forums Authority For MN Commercial …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Subrogation1 of Minnesota No-Fault benefits against a Commercial vehicle insurer or a self-insured Commercial vehicle owneris permitted but must be pursued in Arbitration of Minnesota No-Fault benefits against the owner of an at faultcommercial vehicle is permitted by Statute provides that an insurance carrier which paid Minnesota No-Fault PIP benefits may pursue recovery of the paid benefits against the reparation obligor of acommercial vehicle. Generally, subrogation, or indemnity, of PIP benefits is not allowed underMinnesota Statutes 65B. One exception is under Minnesota Statute against acommercial vehicle reparation obligor. Some trucking companies or Commercial vehicleowners choose to be their own reparation obligor by choosing a high deductible. MinnesotaStatutes specifically defines reparation obligor as an insurer or self-insured. Thus acommercial vehicle owner s choice of a high deductible does not eliminate the jurisdiction andthe statutory intent which the legislature had in allowing PIP indemnity claim is often confused with subrogation pursuant to other subdivisions ofthis statute.
Title: Arbitration Forums Authority For MN Commercial PIP Author: James P. Young, 612-285-7622, Young Law, MN Subject: Arbitration Forums Authority For MN Commercial PIP
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}