PDF4PRO ⚡AMP

Modern search engine that looking for books and documents around the web

Example: marketing

Basic Proof Techniques - Washington University in St. Louis

Basic Proof TechniquesDavid 13, 20101 Four Fundamental Proof TechniquesWhen one wishes to prove the statementP Qthere are four fundamentalapproaches. This document models those four different approaches by provingthe same proposition four times over using each fundamental central question which we address in this paper is the truth or falsity ofthe following statement:The sum of any two consecutive numbers is youwere put on the spot you could certainly convince most reasonable people thatour question is undoubtedly true. However, we are not interested in convincingthe passing layperson. We seek to demonstrate beyond any doubt that ourproposition is true using only the most formal, bulletproof methods following three definitions are central to the execution of our proofs:Definition integer number n isevenif and only if there exists a numberk such thatn= integer number n isoddif and only if there exists a numberk such thatn= 2k+ integers a and b areconsecutiveif and only ifb=a+ Direct Proof ( Proof by Construction)In a constructive Proof one attempts to demonstrateP Qdirectly.

Theorem 4. If the sum a + b is not odd, then a and b are not consecutive integers. It is important to be extremely pedantic when interpreting a contraposition. It would be tempting to claim that the above theorem claims that the sum of two numbers is odd only when those two numbers are consecutive. However, this is nonsense. Proof.

Tags:

  Basics, Technique, Proof, Interpreting, Consecutive, Basic proof techniques

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Spam in document Broken preview Other abuse

Transcription of Basic Proof Techniques - Washington University in St. Louis

Related search queries