Transcription of BLACKLIST ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS: 2016 UPDATE
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: confidence
BLACKLIST ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS: 2016 UPDATE
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE | CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY 1 Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited BLACKLIST ECOSYSTEM analysis : 2016 U P D AT E Leigh Metcalf, Eric Hatleback, Jonathan M. Spring March 2016 Executive Summary This UPDATE , which is the latest in a series of regular updates, builds upon the analysis of blacklists presented in our 2013 and 2014 reports. In those reports, we established that the contents of blacklists generally fail to overlap substantially with each other [1, 2]. This report further corroborates that over-arching result. Our results suggest that available blacklists present an incomplete and fragmented pic-ture of the malicious infrastructure on the Internet, and practitioners should be aware of that insight.
Blacklist curators do not disclose their list production method(s) or the sensor lo- cation(s), because doing so would generate a means for adversaries to keep themselves off blacklists. Vendors also have a strong economic incentive to keep the details of their technical approach secret
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Related search queries
Faronics White Paper - Blacklist-Based versus, Blacklist, BLACKLISTING OF MANUFACTURERS, SUPPLIERS, DISTRIBUTORS, CONTRACTORS AND, Blacklisting of manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, Bulls at Facility, Blacklisting, Appraisal Institute, World Bank Listing of Ineligible Firms and Individuals, Firms and Individuals