Transcription of Catch-22: WATER vs. ENERGY
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: air traffic controller
Catch-22: WATER vs. ENERGY
WATER :ENERGYBy Michael E. Webber A REPRIN T FROM SPECIAL ISSUE2 Scientific American natural resourcesARNULF HUSMO Get t y ImagesIin june the state of florida made an unusual announcement: it would sue the Army Corps of Engineers over the corps s plan to reduce WATER flow from res-ervoirs in Georgia into the Apalachicola River, which runs through Florida from the Georgia-Alabama border. Florida was con-c e r n e d t h at t h e r e s t r i c t e d fl ow wou ld t h r e at-en certain endangered species. Alabama also objected, worried about another spe-cies: nuclear power plants, which use enor-mous quantities of WATER , usually drawn from rivers and lakes, to cool their big reac-tors.
Catch-22: ENERGY Water is needed to generate energy. Energy is needed to deliver water. Both resources are limiting the other ...
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Related search queries
Fit Made, Catch 22, Historical Sources for the Events, Catch-22, Catch-22: Corporate Criminal Antitrust, Catch-22:Corporate Criminal Antitrust Targets Walk, Catch, Temporality, trauma and responsibility, Comment confirmation of a catch-22, The paradox of citizen recording, Catch 22 - The Ivaco Solution, Catch-22' Revisited Joseph Heller, CATCH-22 REVISITED, " Joseph Heller, CATCH-22 Study Guide