Transcription of CHAPTER 9 Documentary Evidence - Shipman & Goodwin
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
9 i CHAPTER 9 Documentary Evidence Michelle L. Querijero, Esq. Shipman & Goodwin LLP, Hartford Introduction .. 9 1 Foundation Requirements .. 9 3 Identification and Authentication .. 9 3 Relevance and No Undue Prejudice .. 9 4 Hearsay Exception .. 9 5 Best Evidence Rule .. 9 5 Sample Examination .. 9 5 Best Evidence Rule .. 9 8 Foundation Requirements .. 9 11 Sample Examination .. 9 12 Business Records.
Brotherhood of Elec. Workers Local 35 v. Comm’n on Civil Rights, 140 Conn 537, 547 (1974) (telephone conversations were authenticated through evidence of occurrence, subject matter, and conduct of parties). Certain documents are self-authenticating—no prima facie showing of authen-ticity is required to be admissible.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}