Transcription of Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment: …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
1 Computerized Neuropsychological assessment : The Good, the Bad, and the UglyMike R. Schoenberg, , ABPP-CNDepartment of NeurologyUniversity Hospitals Case Medical CenterDisclosuresNone2 ObjectivesNeuropsychological EvaluationBases of assessment Traditional Neuropsychological assessment Measures Benefits/Strengths (the good) Problems/Weakness (the bad and ugly) Computerized Cognitive assessment Measures Benefits (The good) Problems (The bad and ugly)ConclusionsFuture DirectionsNeuropsychological Evaluation: FundamentalsStudy of Brain-Behavior Relationships Identifies presence (or absence) of Neuropsychological DeficitsAssumptions for Evaluation Brain dysfunction affects behavior Behavior changes can be associated with particular brain processes/areas/neurological syndromes assessment can be reliable assessment can be valid assessment affects diagnosis/treatment3 Neuropsychological Evaluation: TraditionalAssessment versus Evaluation AssessmentCollection of historical dataCollection of cognitive dataCollection of mood data Evaluation Interpretation of data for diagnosis/treatment planningPurpose of AssessmentScreen for presence/absence of potential problem or change Is performance above or below threshold to identify possible problem?
3 Neuropsychological Evaluation: Traditional Assessment versus Evaluation – Assessment Collection of historical data Collection of cognitive data
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Based, Paper, Medium voltage, Homework versus pen and pencil, Termite: Visualization Techniques for Assessing, Termite: Visualization Techniques for Assessing Textual, Computer, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS, ASSESSMENT, Feedback, How to Measure, PROFESSIONAL BOARD FOR PSYCHOLOGY, Professional board for psychology policy regarding, Ended vs. Close-ended Questions in Web, Ended vs. Close-ended Questions in Web Questionnaires