Transcription of EASA Comment Response Tool - egu-info.org
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: bankruptcy
EASA Comment Response Tool - egu-info.org
EASA Comment Response ToolYou can save this page as HTML and then open it in Microsoft Word for further Rules for Pilot Licensing - Part-FCLNPA NumberNPA 2008-17bEuropean Gliding Union (EGU) has placed 42 unique comments on this NPA:Cmt#SegmentdescriptionPageCommentAtt achments4540(GeneralComments)0 The comments in this Response to NPA17b representthe formal Response of the European Gliding represents the national gliding organisations of25 countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, CzechRepublic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania,Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland,Serbia, Spain, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden,Switzerland & UK) 4544B. DraftOpinionPart-FCL -Subpart A:GeneralRequirements- DefinitionsComment:There is no definition of the proficiency check and ofthe skill test here Instead theses definitions arehidden in GM to (page 170). Since thesedefinitions are important we would prefer to havethem transferred here We also believe thatinstructors should be allowed to perform proficiencychecks (see our Comment on page 16)EGU Proposal:Transfer the definitions of skill tests and proficiencychecks from the GM to FCL 010 4546B.
Cmt#Segment description Page Comment Attachments definition of privileges of the LPL(S) and SPL (See our comments on FCL.105.S, FCL.135.S, FCL 205.S and FCL.235.S) Therefore, EGU believes that a clear
Loading..
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: