Roadmap - ccsso.org

Roadmap For Next-Generation State ... agencies to dramatically improve student achievement through the development and implementation of ... P-20 data systems, and common state standards and assessments aligned with college and career expectations. States have a responsibility to demonstrate this same type of

  Implementation, Common, Roadmap

First 100 Days - ccsso.org

The first 100 days in office are critical to ensuring success throughout your tenure and require balancing many demands while also making important decisions that will set the agency’s path for …

  First, Days, The first 100 days, First 100 days

Council of Chief State School Officers 2017-2020 Strategic ...

2017-2020 Strategic Plan Goal 4: School and District Leaders States support school and district leaders to continuously improve schools Advances equity commitment #4, #8, #9, and #10 States have a responsibility and an obligation to help improve every school (not just the bottom 5%).

  2017, Strategic, Plan, 2200, 2020 strategic, 2020 strategic plan

for National Policy Board for Educational Administration 2015

Professional Standards for Educational Leaders 2015 at a Glance ... What iS thE Link bEtWEEn EducationaL LEadErShiP and StudEnt LEarning? The 2015 Standards embody a research- and practice-based understanding of the relationship between educational leadership and student learning. Improving student learning takes a

  Standards, Professional, Learning, Professional standards

Guidance from nTeP STaTeS for enSurinG a culTurally ...

common language on culturally responsive teaching and relevant pedagogy, along with state-level recommendations and promising examples for extending this work into teacher workforce policies across the career continuum—from teacher preparation to ongoing practice.

  Teaching, Culturally, Responsive, Culturally responsive teaching

Framework for English Language Profi ciency Development ...

2 Framework for English Language Profi ciency Development Standards corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards leaders—the language practices4 that all ELLs must acquire in order to successfully master the CCSS and NGSS and for second language acquisition more generally.

  Development, Language, Standards, English, Corresponding, For english language, Profi, Ciency, For english language profi ciency development standards corresponding

InTASC - CCSSO

2 InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards Acknowledgements InTASC would like to express its sincere appreciation to the National Education Association, the Educational Testing Service, and Evaluation Systems group of Pearson for providing the funding for this project.

English Language Proficiency (ELP) Standards

4/30/14 1.2 ELPA21 States English Language Proficiency (ELP) Standards with Correspondences to the K-12 Practices and Common Core State Standards Formatting 5/30/14 1.2.1 ELPA21 States Word change from “required” to “recommended” in guiding principal 6, page 2

  States, Standards, Recommended

Understanding and Supporting the Educational Needs of ...

formal education (SLIFEs). RAIELs arrive in the U.S. filtering into all grade levels, with varied initial English proficiency levels, educational backgrounds, and home language literacy levels. These students bring unique and valued strengths to the classroom, but also frequently face shared challenges. While RAIELs share with

  Education, Formal, Formal education

Professional Standards for Educational Leaders

leaders along with it. The 2015 Standards envision those future challenges and opportunities so educational leaders can succeed in the future. The 2015 Standards are aspirational in other ways, too. They challenge the profession, professional associations, policy makers, institutions of higher education, and other organizations

  Standards, Professional, Educational, Professional standards for educational leaders, Leaders

A Primer Diagnostic, Formative, & Summative Assessment

The final type of assessment that this essay addresses is the summative assessment. Black (1998, as cited by Brookhart, 1999), explaining summative assessment via analogy, stated, "When the cook tastes the soup, that’s formative assessment; when the customer tastes the soup, that’s summative assessment" (Formative and Summative, ¶ 1).

  Assessment, Formative assessment, Formative, Summative, Summative assessment

The Possibilities and Limitations of Assessment for ...

formative assessment is often reduced to a mini-summative assessment or to a series of teaching techniques for tests. On the other hand, a defense of formative assessment is offered by some researchers that suggest that the threat stems from misinterpretation of the evolved form of formative assess-ment and AfL.

  Assessment, Assess, Ment, Formative assessment, Formative, Summative, Summative assessment, Formative assess ment

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT - Department of Education and …

masters/rethinking-formative-and-summative-assessment 2 Wiliam, D (2011), Embedded Formative Assessment. Victoria: Hawker Brownlow Education, p.127 3 Hattie, J (2003). Formative and Summative Interpretations of Assessment Information: who says formative assessment matters, p.2 assessment as a focus for their work with professional

  Assessment, Formative assessment, Formative, Summative

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: 10 Key Questions

differences between the two types of assessment as, Whereas formative assessment intends to improve ongoing instruction, summative assessment tries to answer the question, Was instruction effective? [ _ More simply, formative assessment is assessment FOR learning, while summative assessment is assessment OF learning. 4.

  Assessment, Formative assessment, Formative, Summative, Summative assessment

Formative and Summative Assessments in the Classroom

formative assessment strategies appear in a variety of formats, there are some distinct ways to distinguish them from summative assessments. One distinction is to think of formative assessment as “practice.” We do not hold students accountable . in “grade book fashion” for skills and concepts they . Formative and Summative Assessments ...

  Assessment, Formative assessment, Formative, Summative

FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE EVALUATION

Whilst summative evaluation by contrast, provides ‘judgements’ by evaluating end-point performance against pre-set criteria and has a focus on supporting out-turn decision making. A comparison of summative and formative assessment methods in education highlights the key differences1: Summative Assessment Formative Assessment

  Assessment, Formative assessment, Formative, Summative, Summative assessment formative assessment

Formative and Summative Assessment Handout

Summative assessment evaluates student learning, knowledge, proficiency, or success at the conclusion of a unit, course, or program. Summative assessments are almost always formally graded and often heavily weighted (though they do not need to be). Summative assessment can be used to great effect in conjunction and alignment with formative ...

  Assessment, Formative, Summative, Summative assessment