Transcription of GUIDANCE FOR THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
I GUIDANCE FOR THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE assessment reporting system (CPARS) August 2017 ii Summary of Significant Changes August 2017 1. Paragraph CPAR Evaluation Methodology has been updated to add the following sentence: Each factor used shall be evaluated and a supporting narrative provided (FAR (b)(4). 2. Paragraph CPAR Evaluation Methodology has been updated to remove the following sentence: Subjective evaluations concerning the cause or ramifications of the CONTRACTOR s PERFORMANCE may be provided; however, speculation or conjecture should not be included. 3. Paragraph CPAR Evaluation Methodology has been updated to add the following sentence: The evaluation should: include a clear, non-technical description of the principal purpose of the contract or order, reflect how the CONTRACTOR performed. be tailored to the type, size, content, and complexity of the contractual requirements.)
guidance for the contractor performance assessment reporting system (cpars) july 2018
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Not Good for Schedule Performance, Not Good for Schedule Performance Analyses, Performance, Earned Schedule for Agile projects, PUMP MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE AND CHECKLISTS, Schedule, Standards, Maintenance Metrics Handbook, Performance Management: The Performance, Performance Management: The Performance Appraisal, Performance Reporting to Boards: A, Performance Reporting to Boards