Transcription of I. TREATMENT OF PRO SE LITIGANTS IN THE ... - Nassau …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: quiz answers
I. TREATMENT OF PRO SE LITIGANTS IN THE ... - Nassau …
1I. TREATMENT OF PRO SE LITIGANTS IN THE COURTSA. PLEADING STANDARDSIt is almost universally recognized in both New York State and Federal Court that pro sepleadings are construed more liberally than those prepared by attorneys. 1. New York State Cases a. Pezhman v. City of New York, 29 164, 168, 812 14, 18 (1stDep t 2006) (a pro se complaint should be construed liberally in favor of the pleader).b. Rosen v. Baum, 164 809, 811, 559 541, 542 (1st Dep t 1990)(same).c. Planck v. SUNY Board of Trustees, 18 988, 990. 795 147,149 (3rd Dep t), lv. dsmsd., 5 3d 844, 805 595 (2005) (complaint dismissed evenafter applying the liberal and broad interpretation to the complaint as is appropriate with a prose litigant ).d. Net Com Data Corp. of New York v. Brunetti, 2010 Misc. LEXIS 1436(Sup. Ct. Nassau Co.)
2 a. Brown v. Astoria Federal Savings, 51 A.D.3d 961, 858 N.Y.S.2d 793 (2nd Dep’t 2008) (pro se plaintiff’s complaint dismissed where willful and contumacious nature ofconduct could be inferred from refusal to submit to deposition, to respond to other discovery
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: