Transcription of ICP OPTICAL EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY TECHNICAL NOTE …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
ICP-OES, ICP-MS and AAS Techniques ComparedGeoff TylerJobin Yvon , Horiba GroupLongjumeau, FranceKeywords: atomic SPECTROSCOPY , detection limit, linear dynamic range, interferences, precision, costof ownership, sample throughput1 IntroductionInductively coupled plasma- OPTICAL emissionspectrometry (ICP-OES) is an attractive tech-nique that has led many analysts to ask whetherit is wiser to buy an ICP-OES or to stay with theirtrusted atomic absorption technique (AAS) (1).More recently, a new and more expensive tech-nique, inductively coupled plasma-mass spec-trometry (ICP-MS), has been introduced as a rou-tine tool (2).
4 ICP OPTICAL EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY TECHNICAL NOTE 05 40Ar16O on56Fe, or 40Ar-40Ar on 80Se. Element equations (similar in principle to inter-ele-ment correction in ICP-OES) can be used.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Environmentally Critical Elements presentation, ELEMENTS, By inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry, ELEMENTS by ICP 7301 Aqua Regia Ashing, ELEMENTS by ICP, Nitric/Perchloric Acid Ashing, Introduction Detection limits AAS vs ICP, Varian Vista-MPX, Application note, Inductively-coupled plasma, ICP-MS Detection Limit Guidance