Transcription of IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: dental hygienist
IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA . CASE NO CCT/25/94. In the matter between: MHLUNGU AND FOUR OTHERS Applicants and THE STATE Respondents HEARD ON : 23 February 1995. DELIVERED ON : 8 June 1995. JUDGMENT. [1] MAHOMED J: I have had the privilege of reading the judgment of Kentridge AJ in this matter and the comments made thereon by some of my esteemed colleagues. I respectfully agree that - (a) section 102 of the constitution of the Republic of SOUTH AFRICA , 1993 ( the constitution ) did not entitle the COURT a quo to refer to this COURT the issue of the proper interpretation of section 241(8) of the constitution .
MAHOMED J 2 such proceedings shall be brought before the court having jurisdiction under this Constitution". The attraction of the analysis of section 241(8) which
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Related search queries
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, SOUTH AFRICAN, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ROLE OF, The South African, Moral theory and human rights in, African, Moral theory and human rights in South Africa, Chapter 7, South, State capture towards a, State capture towards a reconfigured alliance, Constitution, My Rights My Responsibilities