Transcription of Misleading Mercury-exposure Comparisons: Thimerosal ...
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: marketing
Misleading Mercury-exposure Comparisons: Thimerosal ...
1 Misleading Mercury-exposure Comparisons: Thimerosal -preserved Flu Shot Versus the Eating of Tuna Fish by: Paul G. King, PhD Initial Comments First of all the common statement: My doctor says there is more mercury in a can of tuna fish than in a vaccination is intentionally Misleading for several reasons including, but not limited to: A. The statement provides no basis values for comparison ; B. It ignores the differences in the mode of administration between tuna fish (which is eaten) and a vaccine (which is injected); C. It ignores the reality that really young (< 1-year-old) American children do not eat any tuna fish but they are allowed be given Thimerosal -preserved vaccine doses including, 1. In 2009, twice as many doses of flu shots that they would have been recommended to receive prior to 2009 and 2.
2. The Mercury (Hg) in a Dose of a Thimerosal-preserved Inactivated-influenza Vaccine Formulated at a N ominal Thimerosal Level of 0.01 % . For a Thimerosal-preserved vaccine, where the nominal level of Thimerosal, sodium ethyl
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: