Misleading Mercury-exposure Comparisons: Thimerosal ...

1 Misleading Mercury-exposure Comparisons: Thimerosal - preserved Flu Shot Versus the Eating of Tuna Fish by: Paul G. King, PhD Initial Comments First of all the common statement: My doctor says there is more mercury in a can of tuna fish than in a vaccination is intentionally Misleading for several reasons including, but not limited to: A. The statement provides no basis values for comparison ; B. It ignores the differences in the mode of administration between tuna fish (which is eaten) and a vaccine (which is injected); C. It ignores the reality that really young (< 1-year-old) American children do not eat any tuna fish but they are allowed be given Thimerosal - preserved vaccine doses including, 1. In 2009, twice as many doses of flu shots that they would have been recommended to receive prior to 2009 and 2. Infinitely more than the dose of Thimerosal they would have been recommended to receive from a flu shot before 2002 because, prior to 2002, a.

1 Misleading Mercury-exposure Comparisons: Thimerosal-preserved Flu Shot Versus the Eating of Tuna Fish . by: Paul G. King, PhD . Initial Comments

Loading..

Tags:

  Comparison, Mercury, Exposure, Misleading, Preserved, Isothermal, Misleading mercury exposure comparisons, Thimerosal preserved

Information