Transcription of Nutrition Assessment Tools: Comparison Guide
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Validated Nutrition Assessment Tools: Comparison Guide Name Author, year Setting and Patient Population Nutrition Assessment parameters Rationale/ Clarification Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Detsky, et al. 19871 Setting: Acute1,6,7 Rehab2 Community3 Residential Aged Care4 Patient group: Surgery1 Geriatric2, 3, 4, 5 Oncology6 Renal7 Includes medical history (weight, intake, GI symptoms, functional capacity) and physical examination Categorises patients as: - SGA A (well nourished) - SGA B (mild-moderate malnutrition) or - SGA C (severe malnutrition) Requires training Easy to administer Good intra- and inter-rater reliability Patent Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) Ottery, F.
Setting and Patient . Population : Nutrition assessment parameters . Rationale/ Clarification : Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) Guigoz Y et al. 1994
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}