Transcription of Overview and comparison of existing carbon crediting schemes
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: marketing
Overview and comparison of existing carbon crediting schemes
Nordic Initiative for Cooperative Approaches (NICA)Nordic Environment Finance CorporationOverview and comparison of existing carbon crediting schemesFebruary 2019 Axel MichaelowaIgor ShishlovStephan HochPatricio BofillAglaja EspelagePerspectives Climate Group GmbH Page 2 Acknowledgments and disclaimer The paper was prepared by Axel Michaelowa, Igor Shishlov, Stephan Hoch, Patricio Bofill, and Aglaja Espelage from Perspectives Climate Group. This work has been commissioned by NEFCO and financed by the Nordic Initiative for Cooperative Approaches (NICA). NICA was jointly developed by Finland, Norway, Sweden and NEFCO, and established by NEFCO in 2018.
the voluntary offset standards Gold Standard and Verra are discussed. The analysis is of common features and differences is completed by discussing alternative implementation approaches (see the Table below). Overview of key commonalities and differences among carbon crediting schemes . Design elements Commonalities Differences Alternatives
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: