Transcription of Primescan™ Intraoral Scanner Study Overview 2019-2021
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: biology
Primescan™ Intraoral Scanner Study Overview 2019-2021
Intraoral ScannerStudy Overview 2019-2022 Status May 2022 Clinical Studies by features and applicationsContentComparison of digital to traditional impressionDifferent fixed partial dentures spans Ease of useFull arch scanningImplantologyComparison of digital to traditional impression Study NameAuthor/DateMethodStudy ConclusionsLocal accuracy of actual Intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in-vitroZimmermann et al., (2020)In-vitroResults showed that Primescan had higher trueness and values were statistically significantly different from the other IOS systems, except TRIOS .Accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions in patients: an updateSchmidt et al.
In-vitro study on digital splint effect to the accuracy of digital dental implant impression Gedrimiene et al. (2019) In-vitro Primescan™ showed the best results of trueness and precision of distance and angle measurements. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in-vitro Zimmermann, Ender, Mehl (2020)
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: