Transcription of Prisoner Intake Systems: Assessing Needs and Classifying ...
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Department of JusticeNational Institute of CorrectionsAssessing Needs and Classifying Department of JusticeNational Institute of Corrections320 First Street , DC 20534 Morris L. Thigpen, DirectorLarry Solomon, Deputy DirectorSusan M. Hunter, Chief, Prisons DivisionMadeline Ortiz, Project ManagerNational Institute of CorrectionsWorld Wide Web Intake Systems: Assessing Needs andClassifying PrisonersPatricia L. Hardyman, Austin, Peyton, Institute on Crime, Justice, and Corrections atThe George Washington UniversityFebruary 2004 This report was funded by the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) under cooperative agreement#01P13 GIN8 with The George Washington University. Points of view or opinions stated in this documentare those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the of Justice or the Washington, North Carolina, Colorado, or Pennsylvania departments Institute on Crime, Justice, and Corrections would like to acknowledge thelong-term support of Sammie Brown, formerly with the National Institute ofCorrections and now back home in South Carolina.
A prisoner’s length of stay at an intake facility varied as well. Nationally, the average length of stay was 40 days for males and 31 days for females. Facility Functions All state intake facilities provide a core set of prisoner intake functions that include— Identifying the prisoner. Developing the prisoner’s record.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}