Transcription of Quantitative versus Qualitative Methods: …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, Vol 1 (1) 2009 Quantitative versus Qualitative methods : understanding Why Quantitative methods are Predominant in Criminology and Criminal JusticeGeorge E. Higgins University of LouisvilleAbstract The development of knowledge is important for criminology and criminal justice. Two predominant types of methods are available for criminologists to use-- Quantitative and Qualitative methods . A debate is presently taking place in the literature as to which of these methods is the proper method to provide knowledge in criminology and criminal justice. The present study outlines the key issues for both methods and suggests that a criminologist research questions and hypotheses should be used to determine the proper method.
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, Vol 1 (1) 2009 Quantitative versus Qualitative Methods: Understanding Why Quantitative Methods are
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Integrated Qualitative and Quantitative Risk, INTEGRATED QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS, Qualitative, Quantitative Research, 2. Qualitative and Quantitative Composition, General inductive approach for qualitative data, General inductive approach for qualitative data analysis, Event Marketing in IMC, Qualitative vs, Quantitative, Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research, or, Descriptive and interpretive approaches to, Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative, Another Means of Worksite Analysis, Qualitative Modelling