Transcription of Radio frequency propagation differences through various ...
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: quiz answers
Radio frequency propagation differences through various ...
APPROVED: Perry R. McNeill, Major Professor Richard White, Co-Major Professor David Shelton, AT&T Wireless Services, Industry Representative Michael R. Kozak, Committee Member Roman Stemprok, Committee Member Fredrik Williams, Committee Member Robert L. Getty, Committee Member Albert B. Grubbs, Jr., Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Radio frequency propagation differences through various TRANSMISSIVE MATERIALS Patrick L. Ryan, Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2002 Ryan, Patrick L., Radio frequency propagation differences through various transmissive materials. Master of Science (Engineering Technology), December 2002, 87 pp., 7 tables, 12 illustrations, references, 47 titles. The purpose of this research was to determine which of the commonly used wireless telecommunication site concealment materials has the least effect on signal potency.
Enduro Composite Systems, Lexan® XL-1 polycarbonate plastic manufactured by GE Corporation and Styrofoam™ polystyrene board manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company. Testing was conducted in a double electrically isolated copper mesh screen room at the University of North Texas Engineering Technology Building in Denton, Texas.
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: