Transcription of Reviewers Comments and Authors Response
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Reviewers Comments and Authors Response Paper number: ADHOC-D-13-37 Paper title: Reverse Back-off Mechanism for Safety Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Authors : R. Stanica, E. Chaput, and Beylot The Authors would like to thank the area editor and the Reviewers for their precious time and invaluable Comments . We have carefully addressed all the Comments . The corresponding changes and refinements made in the revised paper are summarized in our Response below. reviewer #2: This paper has a potential to be accepted, but some important points have to be clarified or fixed before we can proceed and a positive action can be taken. We here summarize this points: 1. It is really unclear to me the vehicular scenario that the Authors take into consideration. This is an important point before we can start to reason about the proposed method seriously. We need to understand precisely if the proposed mechanism is able to face with the following: - different vehicles may have different transmission ranges and receiver sensitivities depending on the hardware devices they mount, The observations of the reviewer are exact; the contention window (CW) is only one of the parameters that can be adjusted in a vehicular environment.
small scale field tests (e.g. F. Martelli et al. “A Measurement-based Study of Beaconing Performance in IEEE 802.11p Vehicular Networks”, Proc. IEEE Infocom 2012, pp. 1503-1511)
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}