Transcription of SLAB TRACK Recent developments in slab track
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
With the growth of traffic intensity itbecomes more and more difficult to carryout maintenance and renewal work. InThe Netherlands, night time possessions often lastno longer than 5 hours, and on the future high speedline in Korea (435 km from Seoul to Pusan) the max-imum effective possession is estimated at no morethan 11/2hours per night. In this respect, the currentincrease in popularity of low-maintenance trackdesigns is not the past, new projects were mainly assessed onthe basis of investment costs, whereas today the prin-ciple of life cycle costing is strongly emerging. As aresult of this new attitude, ballastedtrack concepts will loose attractive-ness in favour of slab TRACK considerationsPresently all over the world non-bal-lasted TRACK concepts are beingapplied, although still at a moderatevolume. The great advantages of suchstructures can be summarised as fol-lows: Reduction of structure height; Lower maintenance requirementsand hence higher availability; Increased service life; High lateral TRACK resistancewhich allows future speedincreases in combination with tilt-ing technology; No problems with churning ofballast particles at the low-maintenance characteristics of slab trackon open line are to be retained, great care must betaken to ensure that the subgrade layers are homoge-nous and capable of bearing the loads imposed.
european railway review 84 track design, which, like Stedef, also uses a rubber boot. Applications include the Channel Tunnel. Another twinblock variant related to Stedef is the
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}