PDF4PRO ⚡AMP

Modern search engine that looking for books and documents around the web

Example: air traffic controller

Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

Journal of economic Perspectives Volume 31, Number 2 Spring 2017 Pages 211 236 American democracy has been repeatedly buffeted by changes in Media tech-nology. In the 19th century, cheap newsprint and improved presses allowed partisan newspapers to expand their reach dramatically. Many have argued that the effectiveness of the press as a check on power was significantly compro-mised as a result (for example, Kaplan 2002). In the 20th century, as radio and then television became dominant, observers worried that these new platforms would reduce substantive policy debates to sound bites, privilege charismatic or telegenic candidates over those who might have more ability to lead but are less polished, and concentrate power in the hands of a few large corporations (Lang and Lang 200)

literatures in economics, psychology, political science, and computer science. See Flynn, Nyhan, and Reifler (2017) for a recent overview of political misperceptions. In addition to the articles we cite below, there are large literatures on how new infor - mation affects political beliefs (for example, Berinsky 2017; DiFonzo and Bordia

Tags:

  Economic, 2016, News, Election, Efka, Fake news, 2016 election

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Spam in document Broken preview Other abuse

Transcription of Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

Related search queries