Transcription of 評讀系統文獻回顧 Steps in conducting a Systematic …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Systematic Reviews ( ) Stepsin conducting a SystematicReview Systematic ReviewandMeta-analysis Critical Appraisalof theSystematic ReviewWhy Systematic reviews andmeta-analysis? Too much information Increased power Less expensive and quicker toconduct then new studies Limits bias Generalise resultsSteps in conducting a SystematicReview Formulationof a question Location andselectionof studies Assessment of qualityof trials Data collection andextraction Data analysis Presenting andinterpretingresultsKey components of a question Clearly defined question that shouldspecify(PICOS): Types ofparticipants Types ofinterventions Comparators Types ofoutcomes Types of studiesTypes of the disease or conditionsthat are of of interest must the SettingTypes of Interventions Clear description control groups,blinding Explanatory trials Determine if an intervention is beneficial in anideal situation Seek to maximiseinternal validity Pragmatic trials Determine if an intervention is beneficial inrealclinical practice Seek to maximiseexternal validityComparators The next step involves defining thecomparison interventions orcomparators a placebo nothing some other treatmentTypes of outcomes Determine the outcomes of interest Howare they measured?
Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}