Transcription of SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: confidence
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as isbeing done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the COURT but has beenprepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See UNITED STATES v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus ARTIS v. district OF columbia CERTIORARI TO THE district OF columbia COURT OF APPEALS No. 16 460. Argued November 1, 2017 Decided January 22, 2018 Federal district courts may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state claims not otherwise within their adjudicatory authority if those claims are part of the same case or controversy as the federal claims the plaintiff asserts.
District of Columbia (District), alleging a federal employment-discrimination claim and three allied claims under D. C. law, nearly two years remained on the applicable statute of limitations for the . D. C.-law violations. Two and a half years later, the Federal District
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: