Transcription of SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: confidence
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1. Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the COURT but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See UNITED STATES v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus BIRCHFIELD v. NORTH DAKOTA. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 14 1468. Argued April 20, 2016 Decided June 23, 2016*. To fight the serious harms inflicted by drunk drivers, all STATES have laws that prohibit motorists from driving with a blood alcohol concen- tration (BAC) exceeding a specified level. BAC is typically deter- mined through a direct analysis of a blood sample or by using a ma- chine to measure the amount of alcohol in a person's breath.
California, 573 U. S. ___, the Court considered how to apply the doctrine to searches of an arrestee’s cell phone. Because founding era guidance was lacking, the Court determined “whether to exempt [the]
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: