Transcription of SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: bachelor of science
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the COURT but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See UNITED STATES v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ET AL. v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
of her discretion. The Attorney General concluded that the legal de-fects in DACA mirrored those that the courts had recognized in DAPA. The Fifth Circuit, the highest court to offer a reasoned opinion on DAPA’s legality, found that DAPA violated the INA because it ex-tended eligibility for benefits to a class of unauthorized aliens. But the
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: