Transcription of SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the COURT but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See UNITED STATES v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus CANIGLIA v. STROM ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 20 157. Argued March 24, 2021 Decided May 17, 2021 During an argument with his wife, petitioner Edward Caniglia placed a handgun on the dining room table and asked his wife to shoot [him] and get it over with. His wife instead left the home and spent the night at a hotel.
Brigham City. v. Stuart, 547 U. S. 398, 403–404 (2006) (listing other examples of exigent circumstances). And, of course, officers may generally take actions that “‘any private citizen might do’” without fear of liability. E.g., Jardines, 569 U. S., at 8 (approaching a home and
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}