Transcription of SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: air traffic controller
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the COURT but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See UNITED STATES v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus VAN BUREN v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 19 783. Argued November 30, 2020 Decided June 3, 2021 Former Georgia police sergeant Nathan Van Buren used his patrol-carcomputer to access a law enforcement database to retrieve informationabout a particular license plate number in exchange for money.
ditional sense. See Kerr, Cybercrime’s Scope: Interpreting “Access” and “Authorization” in Computer Misuse Statutes, 78 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 1596, 1605–1613 (2003). Congress, following the lead of several States, responded by enacting the first federal computer-crime statute as part of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. §2102 ...
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: