Transcription of The Duty Drawback Coalition - Results Direct
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
The duty Drawback Coalition499 South Capitol Street, Suite 600 Washington, 20003 Working to preserve export promotion programs for manufacturers and workers. _____ June 12, 2017 PUBLIC DOCUMENT (filed electronically via ) The Honorable Robert Lighthizer united states Trade Representative 600 17th Street, Washington, 20006 Re:NAFTA Negotiations Written Comments Requests for Comments on Negotiating Objectives Regarding Modernization of the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico, 82 Fed. Reg. 23699 (May 23, 2017), Docket No. USTR-2017-0006 Dear Ambassador Lighthizer: The duty Drawback Coalition1 (the Coalition ) submits these comments to assist the Trade Policy Staff Committee ( TPSC ) as it develops negotiating objectives regarding the modernization of the North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ).
Page 5 • Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States The purpose of drawback was described in 1898, by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Tidewater Oil Co. vs. United States, 171 U.S. 210 (1898), as being “not only to build up an export trade, but to encourage manufactures in this country, where such manufactures are intended for exportation, …
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Federal Farm Promotion ('Check-Off') Programs, UNITED STATES, United, Court, DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Francisco J. Reyes, COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Francisco J. Reyes Caparrós, States Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for, Memorandum, Supreme Court, ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS, Supreme, FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF, Franklin county : board of commissioners : plaintiff