Transcription of THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI - lobis.nic.in
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: air traffic controller
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI - lobis.nic.in
(C) Nos. 464/2014 & 1006/2014 Page 1 of 161 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: + (C) 464/2014 & CM & 915/2014 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL) .. Petitioner versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER .. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate with Ms Prathiba M. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr Chander M. Lall, Mr Anand S. Patak, Mr Ravishekhar Nair, Ms Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr Ashutosh Kumar, Ms Archana Sahadeva, Ms Shivanghi Sukumar, Ms Sakshi Agarwal, Mr Akashay Nanda, Ms Rukma George, Mr Arjun Khera, Mr B. Prashant Kumar, Mr Aditya Jayraj, Mr Sahib Singh Chaddha and Ms Harita Sahadeva, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr Haksar, Senior Advocate with Mr Avinash Sharma, Advocate for R-1/CCI. Mr Salman Khurshid, Senior Advocate with Mr J.
W.P.(C) Nos. 464/2014 & 1006/2014 Page 5 of 161 claim for royalty would fall within the scope of Patents Act, 1970 (hereafter the ‗Patents Act‘) and cannot be a subject matter of examination under the
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: