Transcription of The integrative review: updated methodology
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
methodological ISSUES IN NURSING RESEARCHThe integrative review: updated methodologyRobin WhittemorePhD APRNA ssociate Research Scientist and Lecturer, School of Nursing, Yale University, Connecticut, USAK athleen KnaflPhDElizabeth N. Gray Distinguished Professor and Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Affairs, School of Nursing, OregonHealth and Sciences University, Oregon, USAA ccepted for publication 16 February 2005 Correspondence:Kathleen Knafl,School of Nursing,Oregon Health and Sciences University,Portland,Oregon 97239-3098, : R. & KNAFL K. (2005)WHITTEMORE R. & KNAFL K. (2005)Journal of Advanced Nursing52(5), 546 553 The integrative review: updated aim of this paper is to distinguish the integrative review method fromother review methods and to propose methodological strategies specific to theintegrative review method to enhance the rigour of the evidence-based practice initiatives have incr
Strategies to enhance rigour in integrative reviews It is well-documented that research reviews are considered research of research and therefore should meet the same standards as primary research in methodological rigour (Ganong 1987, Cooper 1998). Cooper (1998) has delineated the process of conducting a research review as encompassing
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}