Transcription of THE MANCHESTER TRIAGE SYSTEM
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: marketing
THE MANCHESTER TRIAGE SYSTEM
MANCHESTER TRIAGE SYSTEM A global solution Jill Windle Lecturer Practitioner in Emergency Nursing Salford Royal Hospital, MANCHESTER University of Salford This session will Explanation Clarification Difference of opinion Launch Internet Explorer Points to make you think Ideas for the future Reasons not to TRIAGE No queue! Minimum wait No risk Identifiable and consistent workload Enough clinicians to manage the patients at the point of entry Reasons to TRIAGE Managing patient flow & assessing risk High patient attendance Staffing levels sub- optimal Signposting to most appropriate care History of MTS. 1997 - a publication 1998 - national solution 1999 - international solution 2000 - 82% UK ED use MTS. 2006 2nd Edition 2011 international gold standard for TRIAGE History Common nomenclature Common definitions Common methodology Robust audit TRIAGE Group: Nomenclature Number Colour Name First Red Immediate Second Orange Very urgent Third Yellow Urgent Fourth Green Standard Fifth Blue Non-urgent Definitive management: Time to be seen First 10 min 0 min Second 60 min Third Fourth Fifth 120 min 240 min MTS - Algorithms Chest Pain MTS 2e 06/06/2005 V Airway Compromise Presentations (50).
A professional triage event A systematic process Facilitated by patient presentation algorithms Uses a series of general and specific discriminators
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Related search queries
Triage, Consistency of Triage in Victoria’s Emergency, Consistency of Triage in Victoria’s Emergency Departments, ACEM POLICY DOCUMENT – GUIDELINES FOR, Acem policy document – guidelines for implementation, Preplanning Disaster Triage for Pediatric Hospitals, Triage First Fast Track Guidelines, Triage RN Competency Checklist, Triage Risk Screening Tool TRST