Transcription of The Outcome Rating Scale: A Preliminary Study of the ...
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
JBT 2(2) pp. 91-100 2/3/04 10:51 AM Page 91. Journal of Brief Therapy Volume 2, Number 2 Spring/Summer 2003. The Outcome Rating Scale: A Preliminary Study of the Reliability, validity , and Feasibility of a Brief Visual Analog Measure Scott D. Miller, PhD. Barry L. Duncan, PsyD. Institute for the Study of Therapeutic Change Chicago, Illinois Jeb Brown, PhD. Center for Clinical Informatics Salt Lake City, Utah Jacqueline A. Sparks, PhD. David A. Claud, MS. The Center for Family Services of Palm Beach County Palm Beach, Florida Industry-wide, there is a trend toward making Outcome evaluation a routine part of ther- apeutic services. Although various multidimensional assessments of Outcome are valid and reliable, their methodological complexity, length of administration, and cost often render them infeasible for many service providers and settings.
construct validity for the three subscales (individual, interpersonal, and social role func-tioning). The research indicates that most of the variance can be accounted for on a single dimension: distress (Mueller, Lambert, & Burlingame, 1998). With increasing frequency, the OQ-45.2 is being used in psychotherapy outcome research.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Good Measurements in Research: Validity, Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability, Validity, Good research, Research, Good, Measurements, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: INTERNAL-CONSISTENCY, 22: Research Methodology for Health and Social, IN CONDUCTING A RESEARCH PROJECT OR, Coronavirus Perceived Threat, Government Response, Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research