Transcription of THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: bachelor of science
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH …
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH africa JUDGMENT Case No: 437/2010 In the matter between: MEDIA 24 LIMITED FIRST APPELLANT KATHU MAMAILA SECOND APPELLANT JACKIE MAPILOKO THIRD APPELLANT v SA TAXI SECURITISATION (PTY) LTD RESPONDENT AND AVUSA MEDIA LTD FIRST AMICUS CURIAE BDFM PUBLISHERS (PTY) LTD SECOND AMICUS CURIAE INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS (PTY) LTD THIRD AMICUS CURIAE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION INSTITUTE FOURTH AMICUS CURIAE Neutral citation: Media 24 v SA Taxi Securitisation (437/2010) [2011] ZASCA 117 (5 July 2011) Coram: Brand, Nugent, Maya, Snyders and Theron JJA Heard: 5 May 2011 Delivered: 5 July 2011 Summary: Defamation action by corporation claim for general damages considered claim for special damages to be brought under the actio legis Aquiliae.
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 437/2010 In the matter between: MEDIA 24 LIMITED FIRST APPELLANT
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Related search queries
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH, THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA . JUDGMENT . Not Reportable, THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT, THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL, OF SOUTH AFRICA, SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA, SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT