PDF4PRO ⚡AMP

Modern search engine that looking for books and documents around the web

Example: air traffic controller

Three Depth-Camera Technologies Compared - UCL

Three Depth-Camera Technologies ComparedFabrizio Pece1and Jan Kautz1and Tim Weyrich11 Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK1 IntroductionWe present a comparison of Three different depth cameras, in terms of their resolutions and precision and their suitability in VR/AR systems. With theterm depth camera we refer to specific hardware capable of retrieving depth information about a scene either using a particular sensor or by runninga stereo algorithm on the colour frames. The cameras taken into account are aPMD[vision] CamCube, aPointGrey Bumblebee XB3and aMicrosoftKinect. We will present for each of them a list of technical specifications, a visual representation of the depth information available and an analysis ofthe depth value precision. Moreover, positive and negative aspects of each camera will be analysed together with a final discussion on what is the bestsolution for BEAMING at the that can acquire a continuous stream of depth images are now commonly available.

Three Depth-Camera Technologies Compared Fabrizio Pece 1and Jan Kautz and Tim Weyrich 1Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK 1 Introduction We present a comparison of three different depth cameras, in terms of their resolutions and precision and their suitability in VR/AR systems.

Tags:

  Camera, Technologies, Three, Depth, Compared, Three depth camera technologies compared

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Spam in document Broken preview Other abuse

Transcription of Three Depth-Camera Technologies Compared - UCL

Related search queries