Transcription of Transfer-Function Measurement with Sweeps - …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
1 Transfer-Function Measurement with Sweeps DIRECTOR S CUT INCLUDING PREVIOUSLY UNRELEASED MATERIAL AND SOME CORRECTIONS THE ORIGINAL HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN , 2001 JUNE, SWEN M LLER, AES member, Institut f r Technische Akustik, RWTH, 52056 Aachen, Germany AND PAULO MASSARANI Acoustic Testing Laboratory, INMETRO, Xer m, Duque de Caxias (RJ), Brazil Compared to using pseudo-noise signals, transfer function measurements using Sweeps as excitation signal show significantly higher immunity against distortion and time variance. Capturing binaural room impulse responses for high-quality auralization purposes requires a signal-to-noise ratio of >90 dB which is unattainable with MLS-measurements due to loudspeaker non-linearity but fairly easy to reach with Sweeps due to the possibility of completely rejecting harmonic distortion. Before investigating the differences and practical problems of measurements with MLS and Sweeps and arguing why Sweeps are the preferable choice for the majority of Measurement tasks, the existing methods of obtaining transfer functions are reviewed.
1 Transfer-Function Measurement with Sweeps DIRECTOR’S CUT INCLU DING PREVIOUSLY UNRE LEASED MATERIAL AND SOME CORRECTIONS THE ORIGINAL HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN J.AES, 2001 JUNE, P.443-471
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Impulse Response Function and, Impulse Response Function and Structural VAR, 5 Design of FIR Filters, Function, Impulse Response, Structure and function of communication in, Structure and function of communication in society, Pulmonary*Function, Tank for water supply systems, Tank for water supply systems using, Impulse