Transcription of U.S. Reports: Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: barber
U.S. Reports: Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
Griswold v. ET AL. V. FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORSOF 496. Argued March 29-30,' June 7, , the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood Leagueof connecticut , and its medical director, a licensed physician, wereconvicted as accessories for giving married persons information andmedical advice on how to prevent conception and, following exam-ination, prescribing a contraceptive device or material for the wife'9use. A connecticut statute makes it a crime for any person touse any drug or article to prevent conception. Appellants claimedthat the accessory statute as applied violated the FourteenthAmendment. An intermediate appellate court and the State'shighest court affirmed the judgment. Held:1. Appellants have standing to assert the constitutional rightsof the married people. Tileston v. Ullman, 318 U. S. 44, distin-guished.
Amendments. By Meyer v. Nebraska, supra, the same dignity is given the right to study the German language in a private school. In other words, the State may not, consistently with the spirit of the First Amendment, con-tract the spectrum of available knowledge. The right of freedom of speech axid press includes not only the right
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: