Transcription of UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: marketing
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KENNETH LAYNE MORRILL; MORRILL & ARONSON, , an Arizona professional limited liability company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCOTT FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a North Dakota corporation; BRADLEY J. SCOTT, an individual; KEMP, JONES & COULTHARD, LLP, a Nevada limited liability partnership; HARRISON, KEMP & JONES CHARTERED, a Nevada professional corporation; J. RANDALL JONES, Defendants-Appellees. No. 14-16922 No. 2:14-cv-00922-HRH OPINION appeal from the UNITED STATES District COURT for the District of Arizona H. Russell Holland, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 19, 2016 San Francisco, California Filed October 23, 2017 2 MORRILL V.
The panel rejected plaintiffs’ contention that the purposeful availment test also applied to this case. First, the panel held that the claims at issue were premised on alleged
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: