Transcription of VALIDITY GENERALIZATION VS. TITLE VII: CAN E S …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: dental hygienist
VALIDITY GENERALIZATION VS. TITLE VII: CAN E S …
LABOR LAW JOURNAL216 2006 Daniel A. Biddle and Patrick M. NoorenVALIDITY GENERALIZATION VS. TITLE VII: CAN EMPLOYERS SUCCESSFULLY DEFEND TESTS WITHOUT CONDUCTING LOCAL VALIDATION STUDIES?BY DANIEL A. BIDDLE, AND PAT R I C K M. NOOREN, Biddle is the CEO of Biddle Consulting Group, Inc. and Fire & Police Selection, Inc.* He has been in the EEO/HR fi eld for over 15 years and has been an expert witness and/or consultant in over 50 EEO-related cases, among other things. He is the author of ADVERSE IMPACT AND TEST VALIDATION: A PRACTITIONER S GUIDE TO VALID AND DEFENSIBLE EMPLOYMENT TESTING. His primary focus at BCG is test develop-ment and validation and working as an expert in EEO litigation Nooren is the Executive Vice Presi-dent of Biddle Consulting Group, Inc, with over 12 years experience in the EEO/HR fi eld, working on the technical compo-nents of numerous small- and large-scale EEO cases.
VALIDITY GENERALIZATION 217 cifi c validation evidence where there is local and specifi c evidence of disparate impact. The goal of this article is to review Title VII
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: